Re: [nyaltnet] WCF RIA Services - Good or Evil?

From: Ben Dewey
Sent on: Monday, March 8, 2010 10:43 PM
Erik,
 
I think I talked about this at #codecampnyc with some people, but to me this argument boils down to your comfort (or compulsion) level with controlling the bare metal.  In my experience, RIA Services works great with CRUD applications.  But, when you need to send complex types across the wire I prefer to go with WCF in one of three ways   (in order of how "bare metal" I consider them). 
 
1.  All Generated on SL Side - Create WCF Service on the Website and consume using Add Service Reference
 
2.  Custom DTOs, Generated WCF on SL- Create DTOs in an SL Assembly and link the files with a v3.5 Assembly using project linker [1].  (At least until .NET 4 comes out with shared assemblies).  Then use 'Add Service Reference' but choose Reuse objects from Reference Assemblies.
 
3.  Custom DTOs, Manual WCF on both - Create DTOs and 2 versions of the WCF Contract (1 normal and 1 async) and share using project linker.  Write the Service by hand on the Website and write the consumption logic by hand in SL.
-Ben Dewey
 
 
 
 
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 9:57 PM
Subject: [nyaltnet] WCF RIA Services - Good or Evil?

As many of you know, I am the organizer for the WPF/Silverlight Meetup.    One of the more interesting developments for Silverlight recently is WCF RIA Services.

 

I was curious what the ALT.NET community thinks about WCF RIA Services.  Is this a good thing that we should encourage?   Is it evil, leading developers down the path to hell?  I have my own opinions, but I’d like to hear especially from those who have used it since my knowledge is still very superficial.

 

Despite my provocative title, I don’t personally believe in technology religion so please support your arguments with reasons that you feel the way that you do.

 

Erik Wynne Stepp | http://azurestuff.com





--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
This message was sent by Erik Wynne Stepp ([address removed]) from New York ALT.NET Group.
To learn more about Erik Wynne Stepp, visit his/her member profile
To unsubscribe or to update your mailing list settings, click here

Meetup, PO Box 4668 #37895 New York, New York 10163-4668 | [address removed]

Typemock

Typemock has provided complimentary licenses of their Isolator product

Barnes & Noble

Mark Israel / Sr. Mgr, Talent Acquisition / misrael@book.com

Other nearby
Meetups
Why these groups?
x

The Meetup Groups shown here are topically similar to New York ALT.NET Group.

Groups are more likely to be displayed here if they:

  • have a Meetup scheduled
  • have a high rating
  • have a group photo
  • are "public" and not "private"
  • have shown they are likely to stick around (older than 30 days)
Find more Meetup Groups
near New York

Log in

  • Not registered with us yet?
or

Log in to Meetup with your Facebook account.

Sign up

or

Join this Meetup Group even quicker with your Facebook account.

By clicking the "Sign up using Facebook" or "Sign up" buttons above, you agree to Meetup's Terms of Service